Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 105 No. 4 (2001) pp. 537-571

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (311K) ]

Invited Papers

Light-Front Realization of Chiral Symmetry Breaking

Kazunori Itakura1,*) and Shinji Maedan2,**)

1RIKEN-BNL Research Center, Brookhaven National Laboratory
Upton, NY 11973, USA
2Department of Physics, Tokyo National College of Technology
Tokyo 193-8610, Japan

(Received February 26, 2001)

Abstract:

We discuss a description of chiral symmetry breaking in the light-front (LF) formalism. Based on careful analyses of several models, we give clear answers to the following three fundamental questions: (i) What is the difference between the LF chiral transformation and the ordinary chiral transformation? (ii) How does a gap equation for the chiral condensate emerge? (iii) What is the consequence of the coexistence of a nonzero chiral condensate and the trivial Fock vacuum? The answer to Question (i) is given through a classical analysis of each model. Question (ii) is answered based on our recognition of the importance of characteristic constraints, such as the zero-mode and fermionic constraints. Question (iii) is intimately related to another important problem, reconciliation of the nonzero chiral condensate <\barPsiΨ>≠0 and the invariance of the vacuum under the LF chiral transformation Q5 LF\ket0=0. This and Question (iii) are understood in terms of the modified chiral transformation laws of the dependent variables. The characteristic ways in which the chiral symmetry breaking is realized are that the chiral charge Q5 LF is no longer conserved and that the transformation of the scalar and pseudoscalar fields is modified. We also discuss other outcomes, such as the light-cone wave function of the pseudoscalar meson in the Nambu–Jona-Lasinio model.


URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/105/537/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.105.537


*)E-mail: itakura@bnl.gov
**)E-mail: maedan@tokyo-ct.ac.jp

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (311K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. P. A. M. Dirac, Rev. Mod. Phys. 21 (1949), 392[APS].
  2. For a review, see S. J. Brodsky, H. C. Pauli and S. S. Pinsky, Phys. Rep. 301 (1998), 299[CrossRef].
  3. K. Hornbostel, S. J. Brodsky and H. C. Pauli, Phys. Rev. D41 (1990), 3814[APS].
  4. J. F. Briére and H. Kröger, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63 (1989), 848[APS].
  5. K. Wilson et al. Phys. Rev. D49 (1994), 6720[APS].
  6. For example,
    V. A. Miransky, Dynamical Symmetry Breaking in Quantum Field Theories (World Scientific, 1993).
    M. A. Nowak, M. Rho and I. Zahed, Chiral Nuclear Dynamics (World Scientific, 1996).
  7. T. Maskawa and K. Yamawaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 56 (1976), 270[PTP].
  8. H. C. Pauli and S. J. Brodsky, Phys. Rev. D32 (1985), 1993, [APS]2001.
  9. For example, K. Hornbostel, Phys. Rev. D45 (1992), 3781[APS].
    F. Lenz, et al., Ann. of Phys. 208 (1991), 1[CrossRef].
    H. W. L. Naus, et al., Phys. Rev. D56 (1997), 8062[APS].
  10. K. Itakura and S. Maedan, Prog. Theor. Phys. 97 (1997), 635[PTP].
  11. K. Itakura, `Toward a Description of Broken Phases in Light-Front Field Theories'
    Ph.D. Thesis, University of Tokyo, 1997.
  12. K. Itakura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 98 (1997), 527[PTP].
  13. K. Itakura and S. Maedan, Phys. Rev. D61 (2000), 045009[APS].
  14. K. Itakura and S. Maedan, Phys. Rev. D62 (2000), 105016[APS].
  15. S. Maedan, Phys. Lett. B437 (1998), 390.
  16. K. Itakura, S. Maedan and M. Tachibana, Phys. Lett. B442 (1998), 217.
  17. K. Itakura and S. Maedan, Nucl. Phys. A670 (2000), 76c.
  18. T. Heinzl, S. Krusche, S. Simburger and E. Werner, Z. Phys. C56 (1992), 415.
    T. Heinzl, C. Stern, E. Werner and B. Zellermann, Z. Phys. C72 (1996), 353.
    D. G. Robertson, Phys. Rev. D47 (1993), 2549[APS].
    C. M. Bender, S. Pinsky and B. van de Sande, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993), 816[APS].
    S. Pinsky and B. van de Sande, Phys. Rev. D49 (1994), 2001[APS].
    S. Pinsky, B. van de Sande and J. R. Hiller, Phys. Rev. D51 (1995), 726[APS].
  19. D. Mustaki, hep-ph/9404206[e-print arXiv]}.
  20. Y. Kim, S. Tsujimaru and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995), 4771[APS].
    S. Tsujimaru and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rev. D57 (1998), 4942[APS].
  21. H. Leutwyler, Nucl. Phys. B76 (1974), 413.
  22. H. Leutwyler, Current Algebra and Lightlike Charges, in Springer Tracts in Modern Physics, No. 50 (Springer, New York, 1969).
  23. Y. Nambu and G. Jona-Lasinio, Phys. Rev. 122 (1961), 345[APS].
  24. T. Hatsuda and T. Kunihiro, Phys. Rep. 247 (1994), 221[CrossRef].
    S. P. Klevansky, Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 (1992), 649[APS].
    U. Vogl and W. Weise, Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 27 (1991), 195.
  25. C. Dietmaier, et al. Z. Phys. A334 (1989), 215.
  26. T. Hama, `The Nambu–Jona-Lasinio Model on the Light-Cone and Its Application to Structure Functions' Master Thesis, University of Tokyo, 1998.
    W. Bentz, et al., Nucl. Phys. A651 (1999), 143.
  27. K. Itakura, Phys. Rev. D54 (1996), 2853[APS].
  28. S. S. Schweber, An Introduction to Relativistic Quantum Field Theory (1961, Harper & Row, Publishers NY).
  29. N. Nakanishi and K. Yamawaki, Nucl. Phys. B122 (1977), 15.
  30. F. Lenz, M. Thies and K. Yazaki, Phys. Rev. D63 (2001), 045018[APS].
  31. T. Heinzl, Phys. Lett. B388 (1996), 129.
  32. T. Heinzl, hep-th/9812190[e-print arXiv]}.
  33. D. G. Robertson and S. Pinsky, et al. in Ref. 18).
  34. J. Jersak and J. Stern, Nucl. Phys. B7 (1968), 413.
    A. Casher, S. H. Noskowicz and L. Susskind, Nucl. Phys. B32 (1971), 75.
    M. Ida, Prog. Theor. Phys. 51 (1974), 1521[PTP].
    R. Carlitz, et al. Phys. Rev. D11 (1975), 1234[APS].
  35. V. A. Franke, Yu. V. Novozhilov and E. V. Prokhvatilov, Lett. Math. Phys. 5 (1981), 239, 437.
  36. W. M. Zhang and A. Harindranath, Phys. Rev. D48 (1993), 4881[APS].