Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 107 No. 3 (2002) pp. 631-636

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (114K) ]

Letters

Quintessence Cosmology and Varying α

Takeshi Chiba1 and Kazunori Kohri2

1Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
2Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8502 Japan

(Received December 11, 2001)

Abstract:

If the reported measurements of the time variation of the fine structure constant from observations of distant QSOs are correct, combined with the Oklo limit, they would strongly constrain the class of the quintessence potential. If these results prove valid, future satellite experiments (STEP) should measure the induced violation of the weak equivalence principle. Future cosmological observations of nearby (z \lesssim0.5) absorption systems would make it clear whether the variation is significant or not.


URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/107/631/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.107.631

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (114K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. Recent experimental constraints on \dotα and \dotG are reviewed in, T. Chiba, gr-qc/0110118[e-print arXiv], in the proceedings of Frontier of Cosmology and Gravitation.
  2. S. M. Carroll, Phys. Rev. Lett. 81 (1998), 3067[APS].
  3. T. Chiba, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999), 08350[APS].
  4. J. K. Webb et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001), 09130[APS].
  5. G. R. Dvali and M. Zaldarriaga, hep-ph/0108217[e-print arXiv].
  6. K. A. Olive and M. Pospelov, hep-ph/0110377[e-print arXiv].
  7. D. B. Kaplan, Nucl. Phys. B 260 (1985), 215[CrossRef].
    M. Srednicki, Nucl. Phys. B 260 (1985), 689[CrossRef].
  8. T. Damour and F. Dyson, Nucl. Phys. B 480 (1996), 37[CrossRef].
  9. Y. Fujii, A. Iwamoto, T. Fukahori, T. Ohnuki, M. Nakagawa, H. Hikida, Y. Oura and P. Möller, Nucl. Phys. B 573 (2000), 377[CrossRef].
  10. J. D. Barrow and C. O'Toole, Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 322 (2001), 585.
  11. C. L. Carilli et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000), 5511[APS].
  12. A. Albrecht and C. Skordis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000), 2076[APS].
  13. T. Barreiro, E. J. Copeland and N. J. Nunes, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000), 127301[APS].
  14. E. J. Copeland, N. J. Nunes and F. Rosati, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000), 123503 [APS].
  15. P. Brax, J. Martin and A. Riazuelo, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001), 083505[APS].
  16. S. Baessler et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999), 3585[APS].
  17. http://einstein.stanford.edu/STEP/
  18. J. Gasser and H. Leutwyler, Phys. Rep. 87 (1982), 77[CrossRef].
  19. R. V. Eötvös, D. Pekar and E. Fekete, Ann. der Phys. 68 (1922), 11.
    P. G. Roll, R. Krotkov and R. H. Dicke, Ann. of Phys. 26 (1964), 442[CrossRef].
    V. B. Braginsky and V. I. Panov, Sov. Phys. -JETP 34 (1972), 463.
  20. T. Banks, M. Dine and M. R. Douglas, hep-ph/0112059[e-print arXiv].

Citing Article(s) :

  1. Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 110 No. 2 (2003) pp. 195-199 :
    Supernova Cosmology and the Fine Structure Constant
    Takeshi Chiba and Kazunori Kohri