Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 119 No. 6 (2008) pp. 939-948

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (338K) ]

Eigenvalue Problem of Scalar Fields in BTZ Black Hole Spacetime

Maiko Kuwata,1,* Masakatsu Kenmoku1,** and Kazuyasu Shigemoto2,***

1Department of Physics, Nara Women's University, Nara 630-8506, Japan
2Tezukayama University, Nara 631-8501, Japan

(Received March 6, 2008)

Abstract:

We studied the eigenvalue problem of scalar fields in the (2+1)-dimensional BTZ black hole spacetime. The Dirichlet boundary condition at infinity and the Dirichlet or the Neumann boundary condition at the horizon are imposed. Eigenvalues for normal modes are characterized by the principal quantum number (0 ≤n) and the azimuthal quantum number (-∞< m < ∞). Effects to eigenvalues of the black hole rotation and of the scalar field mass are studied explicitly. Relation of the black hole rotation to the super-radiant instability is discussed.


URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/119/939/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.119.939


*E-mail: kuwata@asuka.phys.nara-wu.ac.jp
**E-mail: kenmoku@asuka.phys.nara-wu.ac.jp
***E-mail: shigemot@tezukayama-u.ac.jp

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (338K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. N. D. Birrell and P. C. W. Davies, Quantum Fields in Curved Space (Cambridge University Press, 1982).
  2. J. D. Bekenstein, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973), 2333[APS].
  3. M. Bardeen, B. Carter and S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 31 (1973), 161[CrossRef].
  4. S. W. Hawking, Commun. Math. Phys. 43 (1975), 199[CrossRef].
  5. G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 256 (1985), 727.
  6. J. M. Bardeen, W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, Astrophys. J. 178 (1972), 347[CrossRef].
    S. A. Teukolsky and W. H. Press, Astrophys. J. 193 (1974), 443[CrossRef].
    W. H. Press and S. A. Teukolsky, Nature 238 (1972), 211[CrossRef].
  7. V. Cardoso, Ó. J. C. Dias, J. P. S. Lemos and S. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004), 044039[APS].
  8. V. Cardoso and Ó. J. C. Dias, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004), 084011[APS].
  9. V. Cardoso, Ó. J. C. Dias and S. Yoshida, Phys. Rev. D 74 (2006), 044008[APS].
  10. S. Mukohyama, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000), 124021[APS].
  11. M. Bañados, C. Teitelboim and J. Zanelli, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69 (1992), 1849[APS].
  12. D. Birmingham, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001), 064024[APS].
  13. V. Cardoso and J. P. S. Lemos, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001), 124015[APS].
  14. S. Carlip, gr-qc/0503022[e-print arXiv].
  15. K. S. Gupta and S. Sen, Phys. Lett. B 646 (2007), 265.
  16. E. Witten, arXiv:0706.3359[e-print arXiv].
  17. R. K. Gupta and A. Sen, arXiv:0710.4177[e-print arXiv].
  18. I. Ichinose and Y. Satoh, Nucl. Phys. B 447 (1995), 340.
  19. S.-W. Kim, W. T. Kim, Y.-J. Park and H. Shin, Phys. Lett. B 392 (1997), 311.
  20. L. Fatibene, M. Ferraris, M. Fracaviglia and M. Raiteri, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999), 124012[APS].
  21. J. Ho and G. Kang, Phys. Lett. B 445 (1998), 27.
  22. D. Birmingham and S. Mokhatari, arXiv:0709.2388[e-print arXiv].
  23. A. Ishibashi and H. Kodama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 111 (2004), 29[PTP].
  24. H. Kodama, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 45 (2004), S68.
  25. M. Kenmoku, M. Kuwata and K. Shigemoto, arXiv:0801.2044[e-print arXiv].
  26. M. Kenmoku, M. Kuwata and K. Shigemoto, in preparation (2008).