Quick Search:
Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 120 No. 6 (2008) pp. 1193-1205
Effective α-α t-Matrix Interaction at Medium Energies
Arun K. Jain* and
Bhushan N. Joshi**
Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre,
Mumbai-400 085, India
(Received April 3, 2008)
Abstract:
The α-α transition operator-effective interaction,
tαα(E, \vecr) has been evaluated using phenomenological
α-α optical potentials at several bombarding energies,
Eα from 77 to 200 MeV. The results are obtained by solving
the Schrödinger equation with appropriate optical potentials for
various partial waves and then clubbing these with their respective
optical potentials and initial state plane waves. The change of the
α-α optical potential with or without hard core has
been shown to influence the effective α-α t-matrix interactions
drastically. The behaviour of the calculated tαα(E,\vecr)
effective interaction indicates towards a solution of the large anomalies
found in the (α,2α) reaction analyses.
URL :
http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/120/1193/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.120.1193
References:
-
G. Jacob and Th. A. J. Maris, Rev. Mod. Phys. 38 (1966), 121[APS].
- T. Berggren and H. Tyren, Annu. Rev. Nucl. Sci. 16 (1966), 153.
-
D. F. Jackson and T. Berggren, Nucl. Phys. 62 (1965), 353[CrossRef].
-
K. L. Lim and I. E. McCarthy, Nucl. Phys. 88 (1966), 433[CrossRef];
Phys. Rev. 133 (1964), B1006[APS].
-
Y. Ikebata, Phys. Rev. C 52 (1995), 890[APS].
-
G. C. Hillhouse, J. Mano, A. A. Cowley and R. Neveline, Phys. Rev. C 67 (2003), 064604[APS].
- Y. Kudo et al., XI International Conference on Particles and Nuclei (PANIC '87), Kyoto, 1987, p. 374.
-
P. Gaillard et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 25 (1970), 593[APS].
-
A. Guichard et al., Phys. Rev. C 4 (1971), 700[APS].
-
N. S. Chant and P. G. Roos, Phys. Rev. C 15 (1977), 57[APS].
-
P. G. Roos et al., Phys. Rev. C 15 (1977), 69[APS].
-
C. W. Wang et al., Phys. Rev. C 21 (1980), 1705[APS].
-
N. S. Chant, P. G. Roos and C. W. Wang, Phys. Rev. C 17 (1978), 8[APS].
-
T. A. Carrey et al., Phys. Rev. C 23 (1981), 576[APS].
-
R. E. Warner et al., Phys. Rev. C 45 (1992), 2328[APS].
-
A. K. Jain and S. Mythili, Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996), 508[APS].
-
A. K. Jain, Phys. Rev. C 45 (1992), 2387[APS].
-
C. Samanta et al., Phys. Rev. C 26 (1982), 1379[APS].
-
C. Samanta et al., Phys. Rev. C 35 (1987), 333[APS].
-
A. A. Cowley et al., Phys. Rev. C 50 (1994), 2449[APS].
-
G. F. Steyn et al., Phys. Rev. C 59 (1999), 2097[APS].
-
P. G. Roos et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 40 (1978), 1439[APS].
-
Y. Kudo and K. Miyazaki, Phys. Rev. C 34 (1986), 1192
[APS]
-
O. V. Maxwell and E. D. Cooper, Nucl. Phys. A 493 (1989), 468
[CrossRef]
-
O. V. Maxwell and E. D. Cooper, Nucl. Phys. A 513 (1990), 584
[CrossRef]
-
W. G. Love and M. A. Franey, Phys. Rev. C 24 (1981), 1073[APS].
-
M. A. Franey and W. G. Love, Phys. Rev. C 31 (1985), 488[APS].
- D. F. Jackson, Nuclear Reactions (Methuen & Co., 1970), p. 61.
-
N. R. Sharma and B. K. Jain, Nucl. Phys. A 377 (1982), 201[CrossRef].
-
K. Wildermuth and Th. Kanellopoulos, Nucl. Phys. 7 (1958), 150[CrossRef].
- K. Aoki and H. Horiuchi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 68 (1982), 1658[PTP].
- S. Saito, Prog. Theor. Phys. 41 (1969), 705[PTP].
- R. Tamagaki and H. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 34 (1965), 191[PTP].
- S. Okai, S. Saito and R. Tamagaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 47 (1972), 484[PTP].
-
P. Darriulat, G. Igo, H. G. Pugh and H. D. Holmgreen, Phys. Rev. 137 (1965), B315[APS].
-
V. G. Neudatchin, V. I. Kukulin, V. L. Korotkikh and V. P. Korennoy, Phys. Lett. B 34 (1971), 581[CrossRef].
-
G. F. Steyn et al., Phys. Rev. C 54 (1996), 2485[APS].
-
R. E. Warner et al., Phys. Rev. C 49 (1994), 1534[APS].
- S. Saito and S. Okai, Prog. Theor. Phys. 50 (1961), 1561[PTP].
-
P. Swan, Ann. of Phys. 48 (1968), 455[CrossRef].
-
S. A. Sophianos, K. C. Panda and P. E. Hodgson, J. of Phys. G 19 (1993), 1929[CrossRef].
-
A. K. Jain and N. Sharma, Nucl. Phys. A 321 (1979), 429[CrossRef].