Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 125 No. 2 (2011) pp. 205-224

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (292K) ]

Uncertainty Relation and Probability

— Numerical Illustration —

Kazuo Fujikawa1 and Koichiro Umetsu2

1Institute of Quantum Science, College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Tokyo 101-8308, Japan
2Maskawa Institute for Science and Culture, Kyoto Sangyo University, Kyoto 603-8555, Japan

(Received October 15, 2010; Revised December 5, 2010)

Abstract:

The uncertainty relation and the probability interpretation of quantum mechanics are intrinsically connected, as is evidenced by the evaluation of standard deviations. It is thus natural to ask if one can associate a very small uncertainty product of suitably sampled events with a very small probability. We have shown elsewhere that some examples of the evasion of the uncertainty relation noted in the past are in fact understood in this way. We here numerically illustrate that a very small uncertainty product is realized if one performs a suitable sampling of measured data that occur with a very small probability. We introduce a notion of cyclic measurements. It is also shown that our analysis is consistent with the Landau-Pollak-type uncertainty relation. It is suggested that the present analysis may help reconcile the contradicting views about the “standard quantum limit” in the detection of gravitational waves.

Subject Index : 002, 060, 064
URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/125/205/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.125.205

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (292K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. W. Heisenberg, Z. Phys. 43 (1927), 172.
  2. J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1955).
  3. D. M. Appleby, Int. J. Theor. Phys. 37 (1998), 1491.
  4. M. Ozawa, Phys. Lett. A 320 (2004), 367[CrossRef].
  5. P. Busch, T. Heinonen and P. Lahti, Phys. Rep. 452 (2007), 155[CrossRef].
  6. T. Miyadera and H. Imai, Phys. Rev. A 78 (2008), 052119[APS].
  7. E. H. Kennard, Z. Phys. 44 (1927), 326.
  8. H. P. Robertson, Phys. Rev. 34 (1929), 163[APS].
  9. L. E. Ballentine, Rev. Mod. Phys. 42 (1970), 358[APS].
  10. M. Ozawa, Phys. Lett. A 318 (2003), 21[CrossRef].
  11. K. Fujikawa and K. Umetsu, Prog. Theor. Phys. 120 (2008), 797[PTP].
  12. J. Maddox, Nature 331 (1988), 559[CrossRef].
  13. T. Miyadera and H. Imai, Phys. Rev. A 76 (2007), 062108, [APS]and references therein.
  14. K. Fujikawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 124 (2010), 747[PTP].
  15. V. B. Braginsky and Y. I. Vorontsov, Sov. Phys. -Usp. 17 (1975), 644.
  16. C. M. Caves, K. S. Thorne, R. W. P. Drever, V. D. Sandberg and M. Zimmermann, Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (1980), 341[APS].
  17. H. P. Yuen, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51 (1983), 719[APS].
  18. C. M. Caves, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54 (1985), 2465[APS].
  19. M. Ozawa, Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988), 385[APS].