Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 127 No. 4 (2012) pp. 665-687

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (240K) ]

Boundary State Analysis on the Equivalence of T-Duality and Nahm Transformation in Superstring Theory

Tsuguhiko Asakawa, Ursula Carow-Watamura, Yoshiro Teshima and Satoshi Watamura

Department of Physics, Graduate School of Science, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan

(Received January 12, 2012)

Abstract:

We investigated the equivalence of the T-duality for a bound state of D2 and D0-branes with the Nahm transformation of the corresponding gauge theory on a 2-dimensional torus, using the boundary state analysis in superstring theory. In contrast to the case of a 4-dimensional torus, it changes a sign in a topological charge, which seems puzzling when regarded as a D-brane charge. Nevertheless, it is shown that it agrees with the T-duality of the boundary state, including a minus sign. We reformulated boundary states in the RR-sector using a new representation of zeromodes, and show that the RR-coupling is invariant under the T-duality. Finally, the T-duality invariance at the level of the Chern-Simon coupling is shown by deriving the Buscher rule for the RR potentials, known as the `Hori formula', including the correct sign.

Subject Index : 120, 123
URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/127/665/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.127.665

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (240K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. K. Kikkawa and M. Yamasaki, Phys. Lett. B 149 (1984), 357[CrossRef].
  2. N. Sakai and I. Senda, Prog. Theor. Phys. 75 (1986), 692[PTP].
  3. T. H. Buscher, Phys. Lett. B 194 (1987), 59[CrossRef].
  4. A. Giveon, M. Porrati and E. Ravinovich, Phys. Rep. 244 (1994), 77[CrossRef].
  5. E. Alvarez, L. Alvarez-Gaume and Y. Lozano, Phys. Lett. B 336 (1994), 183[CrossRef].
  6. E. Alvarez, J. L. F. Barbon and J. Borlaf, Nucl. Phys. B 479 (1996), 218[CrossRef].
  7. T. Kugo and B. Zwiebach, Prog. Theor. Phys. 87 (1992), 801[PTP].
  8. J. Dai, R. G. Leigh and J. Polchinski, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 4 (1989), 2073.
  9. E. Bergshoeff, C. M. Hull and T. Ortin, Nucl. Phys. B 451 (1995), 547[CrossRef].
    E. Bergshoeff, M. de Roo, M. B. Green, G. Papadopoulos and P. K. Townsend, Nucl. Phys. B 470 (1996), 113[CrossRef].
  10. D. Brace, B. Morariu and B. Zumino, Nucl. Phys. B 545 (1999), 192[CrossRef]; Nucl. Phys. B 549 (1999), 181[CrossRef].
  11. M. Fukuma, T. Oota and H. Tanaka, Prog. Theor. Phys. 103 (2000), 425[PTP].
  12. S. F. Hassan, Nucl. Phys. B 568 (2000), 145[CrossRef]; Nucl. Phys. B 583 (2000), 431[CrossRef].
  13. K. Hori, Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. 3 (1999), 281.
  14. P. Bouwknegt, Lectures on Cohomology, T-Duality and Generalized Geometry, Lecture Notes in Phys. 807 (2010), 261.
  15. E. Bergshoeff and M. de Roo, Phys. Lett. B 380 (1996), 265[CrossRef].
    M. B. Green, C. M. Hull and P. K. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B 382 (1996), 65[CrossRef].
    J. Simon, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000), 047702[APS].
  16. S. F. Hassan and R. Minasian, hep-th/0008149[e-print arXiv].
  17. P. Sundell, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 16 (2001), 3025.
  18. O. J. Ganor, S. Ramgoolam and W. Taylor, Nucl. Phys. B 492 (1997), 191[CrossRef].
  19. W. Nahm, Phys. Lett. B 90 (1980), 413[CrossRef].
  20. M. Atiyah, V. Drinfeld, N. Hitchin and Y. Manin, Phys. Lett. A 65 (1978), 185[CrossRef].
  21. M. Hamanaka and H. Kajiura, Phys. Lett. B 551 (2003), 360[CrossRef].
  22. S. Terashima, J. High Energy Phys. 10 (2008), 033[CrossRef].
  23. P. Candelas, G. T. Horowitz, A. Strominger and E. Witten, Nucl. Phys. B 258 (1985), 46[CrossRef].
  24. B. Andreas, G. Curio, D. H. Ruiperez and S.-T. Yau, math.AG/0012196[e-print arXiv].
  25. D. Duo, R. Russo and S. Sciuto, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2007), 042[CrossRef].
  26. P. Di Vecchia, A. Liccardo, R. Marotta, F. Pezella and I. Pesando, J. High Energy Phys. 11 (2007), 100[CrossRef].
  27. P. J. Braam and P. van Baal, Commun. Math. Phys. 122 (1989), 267[CrossRef].
  28. H. Schenk, Commun. Math. Phys. 116 (1988), 177[CrossRef].
  29. M. R. Douglas, hep-th/9512077[e-print arXiv].
  30. D.-E. Diaconescu, Nucl. Phys. B 503 (1997), 220[CrossRef].
  31. M. F. Atiyah and I. M. Singer, Ann. Math. 93 (1971), 119.
  32. G. 't Hooft, Nucl. Phys. B 153 (1979), 141[CrossRef].
  33. C. G. Callan, C. Lovelace, C. R. Nappi and S. A. Yost, Nucl. Phys. B 308 (1988), 221[CrossRef].
  34. J. Polchinski and Y. Cai, Nucl. Phys. B 296 (1988), 91[CrossRef].
  35. M. Billó, P. Di Vecchia, M. Frau, A. Lerda, I. Pesando, R. Russo and S. Sciuto, Nucl. Phys. B 526 (1998), 199[CrossRef].
  36. P. Di Vecchia, M. Frau, I. Pesando, S. Sciuto and A. Lerda, Nucl. Phys. B 507 (1997), 259[CrossRef].
  37. V. A. Kostelecký, O. Lechtenfeld, W. Lerche, S. Samuel and S. Watamura, Nucl. Phys. B 288 (1987), 173[CrossRef].
  38. S. A. Yost, Nucl. Phys. B 321 (1989), 629[CrossRef].
  39. N. Berkovits and B. Zwiebach, Nucl. Phys. B 523 (1998), 311[CrossRef].
  40. T. Asakawa, S. Sugimoto and S. Terashima, J. High Energy Phys. 02 (2003), 011[IoP STACKS].
  41. Z. Guralnik and S. Ramgoolam, Nucl. Phys. B 499 (1997), 241[CrossRef]; Nucl. Phys. B 521 (1998), 129[CrossRef].
  42. N. Ishibashi, Nucl. Phys. B 539 (1999), 107[CrossRef].
  43. M. Kato and T. Kuroki, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (1999), 012[CrossRef].
  44. D. Youm, Mod. Phys. Lett. A 15 (2000), 1949.