Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 43 No. 3 (1970) pp. 742-768

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (1199K) ]

On the Application of the Veneziano Amplitude to Electromagnetic Mass Differences of π and K Mesons

Toshiyuki Minamikawa,* Ichiro Shibasaki and Tsunetoshi Watanabe

Department of Physics, Tokyo University of Education, Tokyo
*Department of Physics, Tokyo University of Mercantile Marine, Tokyo

(Received October 2, 1969)

Abstract:

Applying the leading Veneziano amplitude to πρ→ηω8, the product of the coupling constants GA2ηπGA2ρω8 is expressed by 4GηρρGω8ρπ. Using this result, the Veneziano amplitudes of πρ→πρ and Kρ→Kω8 are applied to the calculation of electromagnetic mass difference of π and K mesons under the assumption of the field current identity, SU(3) symmetry, and gauge invariance. The results are quite excellent, namely Δmπ = 7.5 MeV and ΔmK = -5.5 MeV. ΔmK can be made negative by a term corresponding to tadpole diagram exchanging A2 meson. In terms of the Veneziano model and field algebra, the whole integral is convergent, that is, the high energy behavior is milder by s-2 than Harari's argument. Further we determine the coupling constants Gωρπ ≈24 MeV-1 and the strengths GS = 3.1 and δ= GS/GD = 0.42 of A1 →ρπ decay by assuming Γρππ = (5/7)mπ. This gives ΓA1ρπ ≈85 MeV.


URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/43/742/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.43.742

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (1199K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. G. Veneziano, Nuovo Cim. A 57 (1968), 190.
  2. C. Lovelace, Phys. Lett. B 28 (1968), 264[CrossRef].
    K. Kawarabayashi, S. Kitakado and H. Yabuki, Phys. Lett. B 28 (1969), 432[CrossRef]; and many published literatures and preprints.
  3. K. Miura and T. Watanabe, Prog. Theor. Phys. 41 (1969), 568[PTP].
  4. K. Itabashi, Y. Kohsaka, S. Miyake and F. Takagi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 42 (1969), 1151[PTP].
  5. H. Harari, Phys. Rev. Lett. 17 (1966), 1303[APS].
  6. Y. Taguchi and K. Yamamoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 38 (1967), 1152[PTP].
    D2µν is different by the factor {(s-m2+u-m2)/2}-1.
  7. F. J. Gilman and H. Harari, Phys. Rev. 165 (1968), 1803[APS].
  8. W. N. Cottingham, Ann. of Phys. 25 (1963), 424[CrossRef].
  9. T. Das, G. S. Guralnik, V. S. Mathur, F. E. Low and J. E. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 18 (1967), 759[APS].

Citing Article(s) :

  1. Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 44 No. 4 (1970) pp. 1022-1033 :
    Electromagnetic Mass Difference of Hadrons and the Parton Model
    Taizo Muta
  2. Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 44 No. 4 (1970) pp. 1098-1099 :
    Comments on the Electromagnetic Form Factors and Mass Differences
    Setsuko Hori and Masataka Hosoda
  3. Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 46 No. 2 (1971) pp. 672-673 :
    Electromagnetic Mass Difference of Pion
    T. C. Chia