Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 44 No. 5 (1970) pp. 1317-1339

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (1155K) ]

The Reggeization of the Bethe-Salpeter Scattering Amplitudes

Hideki Matsumoto

Institute of Physics, College of General Education, University of Tokyo, Meguro-ku, Tokyo

(Received June 11, 1970)

Abstract:

The Reggeization of the Bethe-Salpeter amplitude is investigated with general kernels. Assuming some integral representations for the interaction kernels and the modified propagator of the scattering particles with unequal masses, we obtain a sufficient condition for the kernels to be of the Hilbert-Schmidt type. Provided that this condition is satisfied, we prove the following, by studying the meromorphy domain of the partial-wave amplitudes:
1) the Sommerfeld-Watson transformation can be performed,
2) the asymptotic behavior of the leading trajectory as s →-∞ (s: total mass squared) is determined by the rightmost fixed singularity of the kernels, and
3) if the spectral functions of the integral representations are non-negative definite, the derivative of the largest eignvalue µMax(s, l) = {λMin(s, l)}-1 with respect to the angular momentum l is negative for s < 0 and l > -1, and the leading trajectory is real for s < 0 and is nondegenerate.


URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/44/1317/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.44.1317

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (1155K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. E. E. Salpeter and H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev. 84 (1951), 1232[APS].
    G. C. Wick, Phys. Rev. 96 (1954), 1124[APS].
    R. E. Cutkosky, Phys. Rev. 96 (1954), 1135[APS].
  2. B. W. Lee and R. F. Sawyer, Phys. Rev. 127 (1962), 1832[APS].
  3. G. Tiktopoulos, Phys. Rev. 133 (1964), B1231[APS].
  4. H. Abe, G. Konishi and T. Ogimoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 32 (1964), 348[PTP].
  5. J. Kwiecinski and P. Suranyi, Phys. Lett. 9 (1964), 283[CrossRef].
  6. J. D. Bjorken, J. Math. Phys. 5 (1964), 192[CrossRef].
  7. P. Suranyi, Phys. Lett. 6 (1963), 59[CrossRef]; Doklady Akad. Nauk SSSR 154 (1964), 312 [Sov. Phys.-Doklady 9 (1964), 66].
  8. M. Baker and I. J. Muzinich, Phys. Rev. 132 (1963), 2291[APS].
    M. K. Banerjee, M. Kulger, C. A. Levinson and I. J. Muzinich, Phys. Rev. 137 (1965), B1280[APS].
  9. C. Cosenza, L. Sertorio and M. Toller, Nuovo Cim. 31 (1964), 1084; ibid. 35 (1965), 913.
  10. M. Martinis, Commun. Math. Phys. 6 (1965), 136.
    A. P. Contogouris, Nuovo Cim. 36 (1965), 230.
  11. N. Nakanishi, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 43 (1969).
  12. For the discussions by the use of integral representations, see N. Nakanishi, Phys. Rev. 133 (1964), B214[APS]; ibid. 133 (1964), B1224[APS].
  13. M. Ida, Prog. Theor. Phys. 43 (1970), 84[PTP]; ibid. 43 (1970), 808[PTP].
  14. N. Nakanishi, Graph Theory and Feynman Integrals (Preprint, 1968), Chap. 4; Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 18 (1961), 1[PTP]; Prog. Theor. Phys. 26 (1961), 337[PTP]; ibid. 26 (1961), 927[PTP].
  15. The latter in reference 9), Appendix A.
  16. F. Smithies, Integral Equations (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1958), Chap. 6.
  17. A. C. Zaanen, Linear Analysis (North-Holland Pub. Co., Amsterdam, 1964), Chap. 9, 11, 12 and 13.
  18. F. Riesz and B. Sz-Nagy, Functional Analysis (Frederick Ungar Pub. Co., New York, 1965), Chap. 4, 5 and 6.
  19. Roger G. Newton, The Complex l-Plane (W. A. Benjamin, INC., New York, 1964).
  20. J. D. Tamarkin, Ann. Math. 28 (1927), 127.
  21. lim s →-∞λB(s) = +∞ is already proved by Nakanishi; N. Nakanishi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 41 (1969), 780[PTP].
  22. R. Gatto and P. Menotti, Nuovo Cim. A 68 (1970), 118.
  23. M. Ciafaloni and P. Menotti, Phys. Rev. 140 (1965), B929[APS].
  24. J. Arafune, Preprint UT-24 (1969).
  25. R. Gatto and P. Menotti, Phys. Lett. B 27 (1968), 381[CrossRef].
    E. zur Linden, Nuovo Cim. A 63 (1969), 181; ibid. 63 (1969), 193.
    J. Arafune, H. Ezawa, N. Murai and K. Nakamura, Nuovo Cim. Lett. 2 (1969), 394.