Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 49 No. 3 (1973) pp. 825-851

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (2104K) ]

An Analysis of Some Neutron Transfer Reactions Using Microscopic Form Factors

Masamichi Igarashi, Mitsuji Kawai* and Koichi Yazaki**

Department of Physics, Tokyo Medical College, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo
*Department of Physics, Tokyo Institute of Technology, Meguro-ku, Tokyo
**Department of Physics, University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo

(Received September 7, 1972)

Abstract:

Form factors of one-neutron transfer reactions were calculated by the method developed by the authors for the transition between the two-neutron (or -neutron-hole) state of 18O, 58Ni, 210Pb, 14N and 206Pb and the single-neutron (or -neutron-hole) states of the neighbouring nuclei using the known shell-model wave functions and corresponding two-body interactions. For strong transitions the calculated form factor F is close to that given by the separation energy method FSE, while for weak transitions they are considerably different. The shape of F is intermediate between FSE and FEFB given by the effective binding energy method. Strong correlation was found between the relative importance of the two-body interaction in F and the energy shift of the two-particle (or -hole) level from the zeroth-order shell-model energy. The angular distribution calculated either by DWBA or by adiabatic theory of Johnson and Soper (AD) was quite insensitive to the shape of the form factor inside the nucleus, although magnitude was sometimes different by a factor of 4 depending on whether F or FSE was used. For 18O(p,d)17O and the weak transitons in 210Pb(p,d)209Pb, no satisfactory agreement was obtained by either AD or DWBA. It is suggested that two-step mechanisms may be important in these processes.


URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/49/825/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.49.825

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (2104K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. N. Austern, Phys. Rev. 136 (1964), B1743[APS].
  2. W. T. Pinkston and G. R. Satchler, Nucl. Phys. 72 (1965), 641[CrossRef].
  3. T. Berggren, Nucl. Phys. 72 (1965), 337[CrossRef].
  4. R. Huby and J. L. Hutton, Phys. Lett. 19 (1966), 660[CrossRef].
    J. L. Hutton, Nucl. Phys. A 120 (1968), 657[CrossRef].
  5. M. Kawai and K. Yazaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 38 (1967), 850[PTP].
    M. Igarashi, M. Kawai and K. Yazaki, Prog. Theor. Phys. 42 (1969), 245[PTP].
  6. A. Prakash, Phys. Rev. Lett. 20 (1968), 864[APS].
    A. Prakash and N. Austern, Ann. of Phys. 51 (1969), 418[CrossRef].
  7. K. Sugawara, Nucl. Phys. A 110 (1968), 305[CrossRef].
    K. Sugawara-Tanabe, Nucl. Phys. A 177 (1971), 650[CrossRef].
  8. R. J. Philpott, W. T. Pinkston and G. R. Stachler, Nucl. Phys. A 119 (1968), 241[CrossRef]; ibid. 125 (1969), 176[CrossRef].
    G. R. Satchler, D. D. Armstrong, A. G. Blair, E. R. Flynn, R. J. Philpott and W. T. Pinkston, Phys. Rev. 182 (1969), 1141[APS].
    R. J. Philpott, Phys. Rev. C 2 (1970), 1232[APS].
  9. G. M. McAllen, W. T. Pinkston and G. R. Satchler, Particles and Nuclei 1 (1971), 412.
  10. V. R. W. Edwards, Nucl. Phys. A 138 (1969), 671[CrossRef].
  11. R. C. Johnson and P. J. R. Soper, Phys. Rev. C 1 (1970), 976[APS].
    J. D. Harvey and R. C. Johnson, Phys. Rev. C 2 (1971), 636[APS].
  12. J. L. Snelgrove and E. Kashy, Phys. Rev. 187 (1969), 1259[APS].
  13. H. F. Lutz, J. J. Wesolowski, S. F. Eccles and L. F. Hansen, Nucl. Phys. A 101 (1967), 241[CrossRef].
  14. J. L. Escudié, J. Gosset, R. M. Lombard, B. Mayer, M. Pignanelli and F. Resminn, Compte rendu d'activité du Département de Physique Nucléaire, Saclay, 1970 - 71.
  15. B. Mayer, J. Gosset, J. L. Escudié and H. Kamitsubo, Nucl. Phys. A 177 (1971), 205[CrossRef].
  16. G. Igo, E. R. Flynn, B. J. Dropesky and P. D. Barnes, Phys. Rev. C 3 (1971), 349[APS].
  17. S. Cohen and D. Kurath, Nucl. Phys. 73 (1965), 1[CrossRef].
  18. R. Arvieu, E. Salusti and M. Veneroni, Ann. of Phys. 51 (1969), 418[CrossRef].
  19. N. Auerbach, Phys. Lett. 21 (1966), 57[CrossRef]; Nucl. Phys. 76 (1966), 321[CrossRef].
  20. R. Tickle and J. Bardwick, Phys. Rev. 166 (1968), 1167[APS].
  21. R. A. Moyer, B. L. Cohen and R. C. Diehl, Phys. Rev. C 2 (1970), 1898[APS].
  22. W. W. True and K. W. Ford, Phys. Rev. 109 (1958), 1675[APS].
  23. T. Inoue, T. Sebe, H. Hagiwara and A. Arima, Nucl. Phys. 59 (1964), 1[CrossRef].
  24. M. G. Redlich, Phys. Rev. 138 (1965), B544[APS].
  25. M. Igarashi, M. Kawai, K. Kubo asnd S. Okai, INS-PT-Manual (to be published).
  26. H. Yoshida, INS-PT-Manual (to be published).
  27. B. A. Watson, P. P. Singh and R. E. Segal, Phys. Rev. 182 (1969), 977[APS].
  28. F. D. Becchetti, Jr. and G. W. Greenless, Phys. Rev. 182 (1969), 1190[APS].
  29. G. W. Phillips and W. W. Jacobs, Phys. Rev. 184 (1969), 1052[APS].
  30. J. L. Snelgrove and E. Kashy, Phys. Rev. 187 (1969), 1246[APS].
  31. B. M. Preedom, Phys. Rev. C 5 (1972), 587[APS].
  32. M. Toyama, private communication.
  33. G. Igo, P. D. Barnes and E. R. Flynn, Ann. of Phys. 66 (1970), 60[CrossRef].
  34. G. J. Igo, P. D. Barnes, E. R. Flynn and D. D. Armstrong, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969), 1831[APS].
  35. M. Toyama, Phys. Lett. B 38 (1972), 147[CrossRef].
  36. M. Igarashi, M. Kawai and K. Yazaki, Phys. Lett. B 42 (1972), 323[CrossRef].

Citing Article(s) :

  1. Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 69 No. 6 (1983) pp. 1704-1716 :
    Effects of the Proton-Neutron Hole Interaction to the Form Factor in (d,t) Reactions on N = 50 Target Nuclei
    Ryo-ichi Namai