Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 71 No. 4 (1984) pp. 878-880

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (227K) ]

Letters

The Generalized Stueckelberg Formalism and the Glashow-Weinberg-Salam Electroweak Model

Takashi Sonoda and S. Y. Tsai

Department of Physics and Atomic Energy Reseach Institute, College of Science and Technology, Nihon University, Tokyo 101

(Received August 10, 1983)

Abstract:

By employing the generalized Stueckelberg formalism, an electroweak gauge model is constructed, which preserves all the successful low energy predictions of the standard Glashow-Weinberg-Salam model but involves no physical scalar particle (i.e., Higgs boson). The model may readily be extended so as to allow the electroweak ρ parameter to deviate from unity.


URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/71/878/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.71.878

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (227K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. G. Arnison et al. (UA1 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. 122B (1983), 103; ibid. 126B (1983), 398; ibid. 129B (1983), 273.
    G. Banner et al. (UA2 Collaboration), Phys. Lett. 122B (1983), 476.
  2. J. Kim, P. Langacker, M. Levine and H. Williams, Rev. Mod. Phys. 53 (1981), 211[APS].
  3. S. Glashow, Nucl. Phys. 22 (1961), 579[CrossRef].
    S. Weinberg, Phys. Rev. Lett. 19 (1967), 1264[APS].
    A. Salam, in Elementary Particle Theory: Relativistic Groups and Analyticity (Nobel Symposium, No. 8), ed. N. Svartholm (Almqvist and Wiksell, Stockholm, 1968), p. 367.
  4. For example, P. Langacker, Phys. Rep. 72 (1981), 185[CrossRef].
  5. P. Q. Hung and J. J. Sakurai, Nucl. Phys. B143 (1978), 81[Elsevier].
    J. Bjorken, Phys. Rev. D19 (1979), 335[APS].
    D. Schildknecht, talk given at the Europhysics Study Conference on Electroweak Effects at High Energies, Erice, Italy (Feb. 1983).
  6. T. Kunimasa and T. Goto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 37 (1967), 452[PTP].
  7. E. C. G. Stueckelberg, Helv. Phys. Acta 11 (1938), 299.
    Y. Fujii, Prog. Theor. Phys. 21 (1959), 232[PTP].
    Y. Fujii and S. Kamefuchi, Nuovo Cim. 33 (1964), 1639.
  8. C. N. Yang and R. L. Mills, Phys. Rev. 96 (1954), 196[APS].
    R. Utiyama, Phys. Rev. 101 (1956), 1597[APS].
  9. A. A. Slavnov, Theor. Math. Phys. 10 (1972), 201.
    J. M. Conwall and R. E. Norton, Phys. Rev. D10 (1974), 500[APS].
    K. Shizuya, Nucl. Phys. B94 (1975), 260[Elsevier]; ibid. B121 (1977), 125[Elsevier].
  10. W. A. Bardeen and K. Shizuya, Phys. Rev. D18 (1978), 1969[APS].
  11. T. Fukuda, M. Monda, M. Takeda and K. Yokoyama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 66 (1981), 1827[PTP]; ibid. 67 (1982), 1206[PTP].
    T. Fukuda, H. Matsuda, Y. Seki and K. Yokoyama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70 (1983), 284[PTP].
  12. T. Sonoda, unpublished.
  13. T. Goto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 36 (1966), 1283[PTP].
  14. F. Halzen, Z. Hioki and M. Konuma, Talk presented at the 1983 Autumn Meeting of the Physical Society of Japan (Kobe, Oct. 1983).

Citing Article(s) :

  1. Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 82 No. 2 (1989) pp. 433-448 :
    Quantization of Gauge Theory with Scalar-Field-Dependent Metric
    Shinichi Deguchi