Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 89 No. 2 (1993) pp. 281-312

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (3540K) ]

Invited Papers

Preferred States, Predictability, Classicality and the Environment-Induced Decoherence

Wojciech H. Zurek

Theoretical Astrophysics, T-6, MS B288, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, NM 87545

(Received November 30, 1992)

Abstract:

Selection of the preferred classical set of states in the process of decoherence is discussed with an emphasis on the role of correlations, information loss and entropy. Persistence of correlations between the observables of two systems (for instance, a record and a state of a system evolved from the initial conditions described by that record) in the presence of the environment is used to define classical behavior. From the viewpoint of an observer (or any system capable of maintaining records and utilising information) predictability is a measure of such persistence. \texitPredictability sieve – a procedure which employs both the statistical and algorithmic entropies to systematically explore all of the Hilbert space of an open system in order to eliminate the majority of the unpredictable and non-classical states, and to locate the islands of predictability including the preferred pointer basis, is proposed. The relation between the consistent histories approach and the preferred sets of states is considered. It is demonstrated that histories of sequences of events corresponding to projections onto the states of the pointer basis are consistent. The correspondence between the perceived reality and the evolving state of the quantum Universe based on a prolonged existence of states of individual systems and correlations between them is proposed. This emphasis on predictable existence of states of classical systems and records of classical observers suggests existential interpretation of quantum theory. Existential interpretation addresses the long-standing problem of the “collapse of the wave function” in a manner which goes beyond Everett's relative state and Bohr's Copenhagen interpretations, by identifying the collapse with the decay of non-classical superpositions of states (and of the observers records) into mixtures of preferred states chosen by the environment-induced superselection.

URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/89/281/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.89.281

References:

W. H. Zurek, “Decoherence and the Transition From Quantum to Classical", Physics Today 44 (10) (1991), 36.
J. J. Halliwell, J. Perez-Mercader and W. H. Zurek, eds. Physical Origins of Time Asymmetry (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1993).
W. H. Zurek, “No Information Without Representation", Los Alamos Preprint (1993), submitted to Physics Today in reply to comments on Ref. 1).
W. H. Zurek, “Pointer Basis of Quantum Apparatus: Into What Mixture Does the Wave Packet Collapse?", Phys. Rev. D24 (1981), 1516[APS].
H. Everett III, “Relative State" Formulation of Quantum Mechanics", Rev. Mod. Phys. 29 (1957), 454[APS].
R. Penrose, The Emperors New Mind (Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1989).
J. von Neumann, Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, English translation by R. T. Beyer (Princeton University Press, Princeton, 1932, 1955).
A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, “Path Integral Approach to Quantum Brownian Motion", Physica 121 A (1983), 587.
A. O. Caldeira and A. J. Leggett, “Influence of Damping on Quantum Interference: An Exactly Soluble Model", Phys. Rev. A31 (1985), 1057[APS].
E. Joos and H. D. Zeh, “The Emergence of Classical Properties through Interaction with the Environment", Z. Phys. B59 (1985), 223.
W. G. Unruh and W. H. Zurek, “Reduction of the Wavepacket in Quantum Brownian Motion", Phys. Rev. D40 (1989), 1071[APS].
B. L. Hu, J. P. Paz and Y. Zhang, “Quantum Brownian Motion in a General Environment", Phys. Rev. D45 (1992), 2843[APS].
W. H. Zurek, “Reduction of the Wavepacket: How Long Does it Take?", lecture at the NATO ASI Frontiers of the Nonequilibrium Statistical Mechanics held in June 3-16, 1984, in Santa Fe, New Mexico, published in the proceedings, G. T. Moore and M. O. Scully, eds, (Plenum, New York, 1986).
J. B. Hartle, “The Quantum Mechanics of Cosmology", in Quantum Cosmology and Baby Universes, S. Coleman, J. B. Hartle, T. Piran and S. Weinberg, eds. (World Scientific, Singapore, 1991).
J. P. Paz and W. H. Zurek, “Environment-Induced Superselection and the Consistent Histories Approach to Decoherence", Los Alamos Preprint 1992, in preparation.
J. P. Paz, S. Habib and W. H. Zurek, “Reduction of the Wave Packet: Preferred Observable and Decoherent Timescale", Phys. Rev. D47 (1993), 488[APS].
W. H. Zurek, “Environment-Induced Superselection Rules", Phys. Rev. D26 (1982), 1862[APS].
W. H. Zurek, “Reduction of the Wave Packet and Environment-Induced Superselection", p. 89 in New Techniques and Ideas in Quantum Measurement Theory, D. M. Greenberger, ed. (New York Academy of Sciences, New York, 1986).
W. H. Zurek, “Information Transfer in Quantum Measurement: Irreversibility and Amplification", p. 87 in Quantum Optics, Experimental Gravitation, and the Measurement Theory, P. Meystre and M. O. Scully, eds. (Plenum, New York, 1983).
W. H. Zurek, “Algorithmic Randomness and Physical Entropy", Phys. Rev. A40 (1989), 4731.
W. H. Zurek, S. Habib and J. P. Paz, “Coherent States Via Decoherence", Phys. Rev. Lett., in press (1993).
V. Ambegaokar, Private Communication (1992).
R. J. Griffiths, “Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics", J. Stat. Phys. 36 (1984), 219.
R. Omnès, “From Hilbert Space to Common Sense: A Synthesis of Recent Progress in the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics", Ann. of Phys. 201 (1990), 354[CrossRef].
R. Omnès, “Consistent Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics", Rev. Mod. Phys. 64 (1992), 339[APS].
M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle, “Quantum Mechanics in the Light of Quantum Cosmology", p. 425 in Complexity, Entropy and the Physics of Information, W. H. Zurek, ed. (Addison-Wesley, 1990).
M. Gell-Mann and J. B. Hartle, “Alternative Decohering Histories in Quantum Mechanics", Caltech Preprint CALT-68-1694 (1991).
A. Albrecht, “Investigating Decoherence in a Simple System", Phys. Rev. D46 (1992), 5504[APS].
A. Albrecht, “Following a `Collapsing' Wavefunction", Phys. Rev. (1993), submitted.
C. M. Caves, K. S. Thorne, R. W. P. Drever, V. D. Sandberg, M. Zimmermann, “On a Measurement of a Weak Force Coupled to a Quantum Harmonic Oscillator", Rev. Mod. Phys. 52 (1980), 341[APS].
J. A. Wheeler, “Frontiers of Time", in Problems in the Foundations of Physics, Proceedings of the International School of Physics “Enrico Fermi" (Course 72), N. Toraldo di Francia, ed. (North Holland, Amsterdam, 1979).
H. D. Zeh, “On the Irreversibility of Time and Observation in Quantum Theory", in Enrico Fermi School of Physics IL, B. d'Espagnat, ed. (Academic Press, New York, 1991)
H. D. Zeh, The Physical Basis for the Direction of Time (Springer, Heidelberg, 1989).

Citing Article(s) :

Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 93 No. 1 (1995) pp. 67-85 :
Decoherence on Quantum Tunneling in the Multi-Dimensional Wave Function Approach

Takahiro Tanaka