Quick Search:
Prog. Theor. Phys. Vol. 97 No. 4 (1997) pp. 665-677
Dynamical Gauge Boson and Strong-Weak Reciprocity
Masako Bando,
Yusuke Taniguchi* and
Shogo Tanimura**
Physics Division, Aichi University, Miyoshi, Aichi 470-02
*Department of Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-01
**Department of Applied Mathematics and Physics
Kyoto University,
Kyoto 606-01
(Received October 31, 1996)
Abstract:
It is proposed that asymptotically non-free gauge theories can be
consistently interpreted as theories of composite gauge bosons.
It is argued that when hidden local symmetry is introduced,
masslessness and coupling universality of dynamically generated gauge
bosons are ensured.
To illustrate these ideas we take a four dimensional Grassmannian
sigma model as an example and show that the model should be regarded
as a cutoff theory and that there is a critical coupling at which the
hidden local symmetry is restored.
Propagator and vertex functions of the gauge field are calculated
explicitly and existence of the massless pole is shown.
The beta function determined from the Z factor of the
dynamically generated gauge boson coincides with that
of an asymptotic non-free elementary gauge theory.
Using this theoretical machinery we construct a model
in which asymptotic free and non-free gauge bosons coexist
and their running couplings are related
by a reciprocally proportional relation.
URL :
http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTP/97/665/
DOI : 10.1143/PTP.97.665
References:
-
N. Seiberg, Nucl. Phys. B435 (1995), 129[Elsevier].
-
J. D. Bjorken, Ann. of Phys. 24 (1963), 174[CrossRef].
-
T. Eguchi, Phys. Rev. D14 (1976), 2755[APS].
-
H. Terazawa, Y. Chikashige and K. Akama, Phys. Rev. D15 (1977), 480[APS].
-
M. Suzuki, Phys. Rev. D37 (1988), 210[APS].
-
A. Cohen, H. Georgi and E.M. Simmons, Phys. Rev. D38 (1988), 405[APS].
-
A. Hasenfratz and P. Hasenfratz, Phys. Lett. B297 (1992), 166[Elsevier].
- S. Weinberg and E. Witten, Phys. Lett. 96B (1980), 59.
-
T. Kugo and S. Uehara, Prog. Theor. Phys. 66 (1981), 1044[PTP].
- E. Cremmer and B. Julia, Phys. Lett. 80B (1978), 48;
Nucl. Phys. B159 (1979), 141[Elsevier].
- J. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard and B. Zumino, Phys. Lett. 94B (1980), 343.
-
M. Bando, T. Kugo and K. Yamawaki, Phys. Rep. 164 (1988), 217[CrossRef].
-
A. D'Adda, P. Di Vecchia and M. Lüscher, Nucl. Phys. B146 (1978), 63[Elsevier];
ibid. B152 (1979), 125[Elsevier].
-
I. Ya. Aref'eva and S. I. Azakov, Nucl. Phys. B162 (1980), 298[Elsevier].
-
W. A. Bardeen, C. T. Hill and M. Lindner, Phys. Rev. D41 (1990), 1647[APS].
-
T. Kugo and P. Townsend, Phys. Lett. B101 (1981), 82[Elsevier].
- T. Kugo, H. Terao and S. Uehara, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 85 (1985), 122[PTP].
- M. Bando, T. Kugo, N. Maekawa, N. Sasakura, Y. Watabiki and K. Suehiro, Phys. Lett. 246 (1990), 466.
-
M. Bando, T. Kugo, N. Maekawa and H. Nakano, Phys. Rev. D44 (1991), R2957[APS].
-
G. Moore and P. Nelson, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53 (1984), 1519[APS].
- M. V. Berry, Proc. R. Soc. London A392 (1984), 45.
- S. Tanimura and I. Tsutsui, Mod. Phys. Lett. A34 (1995), 2607;
hep-th/9609089[e-print arXiv].
-
K. Kikkawa, Phys. Lett. B297 (1992), 89[Elsevier].
- K. Kikkawa and H. Tamura, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A10 (1995), 1597.