Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Supplement No.105 (1991) pp. 216-225

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (1065K) ]

21. Accounting for the Sakata Model

Morris F. Low

Department of Japanese Studies, Monash University Clayton, Melbourne, Victoria 3168, Australia


URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTPS/105/216/
DOI : 10.1143/PTPS.105.216

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (1065K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. Cohen, R. S. and Stachel, J. J. (Eds.) 1979. Selected Papers of Leon Rosenfeld (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland).
  2. Elkana, Y. (Ed.) 1974. The Interaction Between Science and Philosophy (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, N. J.).
  3. Fermi, E. and Yang, C. N. 1949. “Are Mesons Elementary Particles?”, Phys. Rev. 76 (1949), 1739[APS].
  4. Hempel, C. H. 1965. Aspects of Scientific Explanation (Free Press, New York).
  5. Hesse, M. 1966. Models and Analogies in Science (University of Notre Dame Press, Notre Dame, Indiana).
  6. Hirosige, T. 1964. “Kagaku-shi no Hōhō” (The Method of the History of Science), Kyoto Daigaku Shimbun (Kyoto University Newspaper), Mar. 23, Apr. 13&27, 1964. Revised and enlarges in Hirosige, T. 1965, 1970, 1-53.
    Hiroshige, T. 1965, 1970. Kagaku to Rekishi (Science and History) (Misuzu Shobō, Tokyo).
  7. Krajewski, W. 1977. Correspondence Principle and Growth of Science (D. Reidel, Dordrecht, Holland).
  8. Maki, Z. 1981. “Soryu-shi-ron no Hatten to Tetsugaku” (The Philosophy and Development of Elementary Particle Theory), Soryushiron Kenkyu 63 (1981), S16.
    Maki, Z. 1984. “How to identify the date of birth of the Sakata Model?” and “How was the way to arrive at the Model?”: From Sakata's note [book]. Talk given at Nagoya Workshop, on Nov. 1, 1984. The Article 18, Part II in this issue.
  9. Matumoto, K., Sawada, S., Sumi, Y. and Yonezawa, M. 1961, “Mass Formula in the Sakata Model”, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 19 (1961), 66[PTP].
  10. Ne'eman, Y. 1974. “Concrete Versus Abstract Theoretical Models”, in Elkana, Yehuda (Ed.), The Interaction between Science and Philosophy (Humanities Press, Atlantic Highlands, N. J., 1974), pp. 1-25.
  11. Post, H. R. 1971. “Correspondence, invariance and heuristics: in praise of conservative induction”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science 2, No. 3, 213-255.
  12. Rosenfeld, L. 1953. “Strife about Complementarity”, Science Progress 163, 393-410
  13. Sakata, S. 1949. “Structure of Elementary Particles”, Kiso-kagaku (Basic Science) 3, 447
  14. Taketani, M. 1936. “Dialectics of Nature”, Sekai-Bunka (World Culture). Translated in The Science of Thought. 1956, No. 2, 40. and, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 50 (1971), 27[PTP].
    Taketani, M. 1937. “On Research Contributions of Niels Bohr”, Sekai Bunka (World Culture).
    Translated in, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 50 (1971), 49[PTP].
    Taketani, M. 1942. “On Formation of the Newton Mechanics”, Kagaku (Science) June, 1942.
    Translated in, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 50 (1971), 53[PTP].
    Taketani, M. 1946. “Conflict between Matter and Field”, Kagaku (Science) 16, 199
  15. Yang, C.N. 1983. Selected Papers, 1945-1980, with Commentary (W. H. Freeman, San Francisco).
  16. Zahar, E. 1983. “Logic of discovery or psychology of invention?” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 34, 243-261