Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Supplement No.141 (2001) pp. 179-241

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (669K) ]

Non-Unitary Boson Mapping and Its Application to Nuclear Collective Motions

Kenjiro Takada

Department of Physics, Kyushu University, Fukuoka 812-8581, Japan

(Received July 31, 2000)

Abstract:

First, the general theory of boson mapping for even-number many-fermion systems is surveyed. In order to overcome the confusion concerning the so-called unphysical or spurious states in the boson mapping, the correct concept of the unphysical states is precisely given in a clear-cut way. Next, a method to apply the boson mapping to a truncated many-fermion Hilbert space consisting of collective phonons is proposed, by putting special emphasis on the Dyson-type non-unitary boson mapping. On the basis of this method, it becomes possible for the first time to apply the Dyson-type boson mapping to analyses of collective motions in realistic nuclei. This method is also extended to be applicable to odd-number-fermion systems. As known well, the Dyson-type boson mapping is a non-unitary transformation and it gives a non-Hermitian boson Hamiltonian. It is not easy (but not impossible) to solve the eigenstates of the non-Hermitian Hamiltonian. A Hermitian treatment of this non-Hermitian eigenvalue problem is discussed and it is shown that this treatment is a very good approximation. Using this Hermitian treatment, we can obtain the normal-ordered Holstein-Primakoff-type boson expansion in the multi-collective-phonon subspace. Thereby the convergence of the boson expansion can be tested. Some examples of application of the Dyson-type non-unitary boson mapping to simplified models and realistic nuclei are also shown, and we can see that it is quite useful for analysis of the collective motions in realistic nuclei. In contrast to the above-mentioned ordinary type of boson mapping, which may be called a “static” boson mapping, the Dyson-type non-unitary selfconsistent-collective-coordinate method is discussed. The latter is, so to speak, a “dynamical” boson mapping, which is a dynamical extension of the ordinary boson mapping to be capable to include the coupling effects from the non-collective degrees of freedom selfconsistently. Thus all of the Dyson-type non-unitary boson mapping from A to Z is summarized in this paper.


URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTPS/141/179/
DOI : 10.1143/PTPS.141.179

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (669K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. M. G. Mayer, Phys. Rev. 75 (1949), 1969[APS]; ibid. 78 (1950), 16[APS].
    O. J. Haxel, J. H. D. Jensen and H. E. Suess, Phys. Rev. 75 (1949), 1766[APS]; Z. Phys. 128 (1950), 295.
  2. A. Bohr, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk, Mat.-Fys. Medd. 26 (1952), No. 14.
    A. Bohr and B. R. Mottelson, K. Dan. Vidensk. Selsk. Mat.-Fys. Medd. 27 (1953), No. 16.
  3. T. Marumori, Prog. Theor. Phys. 24 (1960), 331[PTP].
  4. R. Arvieu and M. Vénéroni, Comptes rendus 250 (1960), 992.
  5. M. Baranger, Phys. Rev. 120 (1960), 957[APS].
  6. S. T. Beliaev and V. G. Zelevinski, Nucl. Phys. 39 (1962), 582[CrossRef].
  7. T. Marumori, M. Yamamura and A. Tokunaga, Prog. Theor. Phys. 31 (1964), 1009[PTP].
  8. T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Phys. Rev. 58 (1940), 1098[APS].
  9. E. R. Marshalek, Nucl. Phys. A347 (1980), 253[Elsevier].
  10. References for the boson mapping theories are in:
    A. Klein and E. R. Marshalek, Rev. Mod. Phys. 63 (1991), 375.
  11. M. Kleber, Phys. Lett. 30B (1969), 588.
  12. S. G. Lie and G. Holzwarth, Phys. Rev. C12 (1975), 1035[APS].
  13. G. Holzwarth, D. Janssen and R. V. Jolos, Nucl. Phys. A261 (1976), 1[Elsevier].
  14. T. Kishimoto and T. Tamura, Nucl. Phys. A270 (1976), 317[Elsevier].
  15. S. Iwasaki, F. Sakata and K. Takada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 57 (1977), 1289[PTP].
  16. T. Marumori, K. Takada and F. Sakata, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 71 (1981), 1[PTP].
  17. D. Janssen, F. Dönau, S. Frauendorf and R. V. Jolos, Nucl. Phys. A172 (1971), 145[Elsevier].
  18. F. J. Dyson, Phys. Rev. 102 (1956), 1217[APS]; ibid. 102 (1956), 1230[APS].
  19. K. Takada, Phys. Rev. C38 (1988), 2450[APS].
  20. K. Takada, Nucl. Phys. A510 (1990), 244[Elsevier].
  21. K. Takada and S. Tazaki, Nucl. Phys. A448 (1986), 56[Elsevier].
  22. H. Tsukuma, H. Thorn and K. Takada, Nucl. Phys. A466 (1987), 70[Elsevier].
  23. K. Takada and Y. R. Shimizu, Nucl. Phys. A523 (1991), 354[Elsevier].
  24. K. Takada and Y. R. Shimizu, Prog. Theor. Phys. 95 (1996), 1121[PTP].
  25. T. Marumori, T. Maskawa, F. Sakata and A.Kuriyama, Prog. Theor. Phys. 64 (1980), 1294[PTP].
  26. T. Marumori, F. Sakata, T. Une, Y. Hashimoto and T. Maskawa, Prog. Theor. Phys. 66 (1981), 1651[PTP].
  27. K. Takada and Y. R. Shimizu, Nucl. Phys. A468 (1987), 11[Elsevier].
  28. Y. R. Shimizu and K. Takada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 77 (1987), 1192[PTP].
  29. H. J. Lipkin, N. Meshkov and A. J. Glick, Nucl. Phys. 62 (1965), 188[CrossRef].
  30. K. Takada, M. Sato and S. Yasumoto, Prog. Theor. Phys. 104 (2000), 173[PTP].
  31. T. Tamura, Phys. Rev. 28 (1983), 2480[APS].
  32. P. S. Park, Phys. Rev. C35 (1987), 807[APS].
  33. K. Takada, Nucl. Phys. A439 (1985), 489[Elsevier].
  34. H. B. Geyer and F. J. W. Hahne, Nucl. Phys. A363 (1981), 45[Elsevier].
  35. G. K. Kim, and C. M. Vincent, Phys. Rev. C37 (1988), 2176[APS].
  36. C. M. Vincent, L. J. Henry and G. K. Kim, Phys. Rev. C39 (1989), 1583[APS].
  37. S. Okubo, Phys. Rev. 10 (1974), 2048[APS].
  38. S. Y. Li, A. Klein and R. M. Dreizler, J. Math. Phys. 11 (1970), 975.
  39. S. Ichikawa and K. Takada, Nucl. Phys. A552 (1993), 193[Elsevier].
  40. M. Sato and K. Takada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 100 (1998), 581[PTP].
  41. A. Kajiyama, K. Taniguchi and Y. Miyanishi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 101 (1999), 579[PTP].
  42. M. Sato, Y. R. Shimizu and K. Takada, Prog. Theor. Phys. 102 (1999), 287[PTP].
  43. K. Takada and K. Yamada, Nucl. Phys. A462 (1987), 561[Elsevier].
  44. K. Yamada and K. Takada, Nucl. Phys. A480 (1988), 143[Elsevier].
  45. C.-T. Li, Phys. Lett. 120B (1983), 251.
  46. K. Takada, S. Tazaki and T. Tamura, Phys. Rev. C31 (1985), 1948[APS].
  47. T. Kishimoto and T. Tamura, Phys. Rev. C27 (1983), 341[APS].
  48. H. Sakamoto and T. Kishimoto, Nucl. Phys. A486 (1988), 1[Elsevier].
  49. H. Sakamoto and T. Kishimoto, Nucl. Phys. A528 (1991), 73[Elsevier].
  50. D. Janssen, R. V. Jolos and F. Dönau, Nucl. Phys. A224 (1974), 93[Elsevier].
  51. K. Takada, K. Yamada and H. Tsukuma, Nucl. Phys. A496 (1989), 224[Elsevier].
  52. Recently M. Sato has calculated the sixth-order expansion of the NHP for a special case;
    M. Sato, Dr. Thesis, March, 2000.
  53. D. J. Thouless, Nucl. Phys. 22 (1960), 225[Elsevier].
  54. F. Sakata, T. Marumori, Y. Hashimoto and T. Une, Prog. Theor. Phys. 70 (1983), 424[PTP].
  55. A. Kuriyama and M. Yamamura, Prog. Theor. Phys. 66 (1981), 2130[PTP].
  56. M.  Matsuo and K. Matsuyanagi, Prog. Theor. Phys. 74 (1985), 288[PTP]; 1227.
  57. K. Takada, Y. R. Shimizu and H. Thorn, Nucl. Phys. A485 (1988), 189[Elsevier].
  58. H. Thorn, Y. R. Shimizu and K. Takada, Nucl. Phys. A486 (1988), 221[Elsevier].
  59. K. Yamada, K. Takada and H. Tsukuma, Nucl. Phys. A496 (1989), 239[Elsevier].
  60. K. Yamada and K. Takada, Nucl. Phys. A503 (1989), 53[Elsevier].

Citing Article(s) :

  1. Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 110 No. 3 (2003) pp. 499-516 :
    Correlation Analysis of Quantum Fluctuations and Repulsion Effects of Classical Dynamics in SU(3) model
    Shigeyasu Fujiwara and Fumihiko Sakata
  2. Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 116 No. 1 (2006) pp. 107-126 :
    Dyson Boson Mapping and Shell-Model Calculations for Even-Even Nuclei
    Kenjiro Takada, Shigeru Tazaki and Seiichi Yasumoto
  3. Progress of Theoretical Physics Vol. 121 No. 1 (2009) pp. 73-83 :
    Modified Hermitian Treatment of Dyson Boson Expansion Theory
    Atsushi Kajiyama