Quick Search:
Prog. Theor. Phys. Supplement No.154 (2004) pp. 209-216
The Nuclear Potential in Heavy-Ion Fusion
M. Dasgupta,1
D. J. Hinde,1
J. O. Newton1 and
K. Hagino2
1Department of Nuclear Physics, Research School of Physical Sciences and
Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra, ACT 0200, Australia
2Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University,
Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
Abstract:
Fits to high precision fusion cross-sections even for ZPZT <
1000 appear to need a value of the diffuseness parameter a of the
Woods-Saxon potential of \simeq1 fm, which is much larger than the
commonly accepted value of \simeq 0.65 fm.
However, use of large values of a
necessarily makes the potential pocket very shallow for realistic values of
the nuclear potential depth. For larger values of angular momenta the pocket
disappears, and a fusion barrier energy or radius can no longer be defined.
In the absence of a potential pocket, fusion does not occur in the commonly
used realistic coupled channels code CCFULL where fusion is
calculated by applying an incoming wave boundary
condition at the position of the minimum of the attractive pocket.
For this reason, realistic coupled channels calculations with large
values of a have needed unrealistically deep nuclear potentials.
Once the potential depth is constrained to reasonable values, the
data cannot be explained by simply changing the diffuseness of the nuclear
potential. This indicates the necessity to go beyond the potential model,
and incorporate dynamical effects as the two nuclei move towards fusion,
even for light systems with ZPZT < 1000.
URL :
http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTPS/154/209/
DOI : 10.1143/PTPS.154.209
References:
- M. Dasgupta et al., Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 48 (1998), 401.
-
J. R. Leigh et al., Phys. Rev. C 52 (1995), 3151[APS].
-
A. M. Stefanini et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995), 864[APS].
-
J. D. Bierman et al., Phys. Rev. C 54 (1996), 3068[APS].
- J. O. Newton et al., submitted to Phys. Rev. C (2004).
- R. A. Broglia and A. Winther, Heavy Ion Reactions Lecture Notes, Volume I: Elastic and Inelastic Reactions (Benjamin/Cummings, Reading, 1981), p114.
- Ó. Akyüz and A. Winther, Proc. Enrico Fermi Intern. School of Physics 1979, ed. R. A. Broglia, C. H. Dasso and R. Richi (North-Holland, Amsterdam, 1981).
-
C. H. Dasso and S. Landowne, Comput. Phys. Commun. 46 (1987), 187[CrossRef].
-
J. Fernández-Niello, C. H. Dasso and S. Landowne, Comput. Phys. Commun. 54 (1989), 409[CrossRef].
-
M. Dasgupta et al., Nucl. Phys. A 539 (1992), 351[CrossRef]; ANU internal report, P-1333 (1997).
-
K. Hagino, N. Rowley and A. T. Kruppa, Comput. Phys. Commun. 123 (1999), 143[CrossRef].
-
J. R. Birkelund et al., Phys. Rep. 56 (1979), 107[CrossRef].
-
C. Y. Wong, Phys. Rev. Lett. 31 (1973), 766[APS].
-
N. Rowley et al., J. of Phys. G 15 (1989), L269[IoP STACKS].
-
B. B. Back et al., Phys. Rev. C 32 (1985), 195[APS].
-
H. Zhang et al., Nucl. Phys. A 512 (1990), 531[Elsevier].
-
D. J. Hinde et al., Phys. Rev. C 60 (1999), 054602[APS].
-
I. J. Thompson, Comput. Phys. Reports 7 (1988), 167[CrossRef].
(Later versions include coupling to all orders in the nuclear coupling potential.)
-
H. Esbensen et al., Phys. Rev. C 36 (1987), 2359[APS].
-
C. L. Jiang et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002), 052701[APS].
-
K. Hagino, N. Rowley and M. Dasgupta, Phys. Rev. C 67 (2003), 054603[APS].
Citing Article(s) :
-
Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement No.154 (2004) pp. 31-36
:
-
Subbarrier Fusion and Barrier Distributions of 48Ca+90,96Zr
-
F. Scarlassara, G. Montagnoli, S. Beghini, R. Silvestri, A. M. Stefanini, L. Corradi, B. R. Behera, E. Fioretto, S. Szilner, M. Trotta, Y. W. Wu, Z. H. Liu, M. Ruan, F. Yang and H. Q. Zhang
-
Progress of Theoretical Physics Supplement No.154 (2004) pp. 465-472
:
-
FUSION03, Concluding Remarks
-
A. B. Balantekin