Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Supplement No.154 (2004) pp. 77-84

[ Full Text PDF (170K) ]  [ Buy This Article ]

Reaction Dynamics for Fusion of Weakly-Bound Nuclei

Kouichi Hagino1 and Andrea Vitturi2

1Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
2Dipartimento di Fisica, Universita di Padova and INFN, I-35131 Padova, Italy

Abstract:

We discuss several open problems of fusion reactions induced by weakly bound nuclei. For this purpose, we solve a one dimensional three-body Hamiltonian with the coupled-channels formalism. We show that the continuum-continuum couplings substantially reduce the total fusion probability at energies above the barrier compared with the no-breakup case, although the fusion probability remains enhanced at subbarrier energies. We then discuss a role of transfer process in fusion of weakly bound nuclei, and point out that removing spurious Pauli forbidden transfer components from the calculation may be crucial at energies below the barrier. Calculations based on the three-body classical trajectory Monte Carlo (CTMC) method are also presented in order to discuss how to model complete fusion process.


URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTPS/154/77/
DOI : 10.1143/PTPS.154.77

[ Full Text PDF (170K) ]  [ Buy This Article ]  Citation:


References:

  1. M. S. Hussein, M. P. Pato, L. F. Canto and R. Donangelo, Phys. Rev. C 46 (1992), 377[APS].
    W. H. Z. Cardenas, L. F. Canto, R. Donangelo, M. S. Hussein, J. Lubian and A. Romanelli, Nucl. Phys. A 703 (2002), 633[CrossRef].
  2. N. Takigawa, M. Kuratani and H. Sagawa, Phys. Rev. C 47 (1993), R2470[APS].
  3. C. H. Dasso and A. Vitturi, Phys. Rev. C 50 (1994), R12[APS].
  4. K. Hagino, A. Vitturi, C. H. Dasso, and S. M. Lenzi, Phys. Rev. C 61 (2000), 037602[APS].
  5. A. Diaz-Torres and I. J. Thompson, Phys. Rev. C 65 (2002), 024606[APS].
  6. K. Yabana and Y. Suzuki, Nucl. Phys. A 588 (1995), c99[CrossRef].
    K. Yabana, Prog. Theor. Phys. 97 (1997), 437[IPAP].
  7. K. Yabana, M. Ueda and T. Nakatsukasa, Nucl. Phys. A 722 (2003), C261[CrossRef].
  8. M. Dasgupta et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999), 1395[APS]; Phys. Rev. C 66 (2002), 041602[APS](R).
  9. I. Padron et al., Phys. Rev. C 66 (2002), 044608[APS].
  10. C. Signorini et al., Eur. Phys. J. A 2 (1998), 227[CrossRef]; Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 154 (2004), 272[IPAP].
  11. K. Hagino, M. Dasgupta, and D. J. Hinde, Nucl. Phys. A (to be published).
  12. F. Pérez-Bernal, I. Martel, J. M. Arias and J. Gómez-Camacho, Phys. Rev. A 67 (2003), 052108[APS].
  13. W. Brenig and R. Russ, Surf. Sci. 315 (1994), 195[CrossRef].
    W. Brenig, T. Brunner, A. Gross and R. Russ, Z. Phys. B 93 (1993), 91[CrossRef].
  14. K. Hagino and A. B. Balantekin, (to be published).
  15. N. Rowley, I. J. Thompson and M. A. Nagarajan, Phys. Lett. B 282 (1992), 276[CrossRef].
  16. W. von Oertzen and I. Krouglov, Phys. Rev. C 53 (1996), R1061[APS].
  17. H. Esbensen, S. H. Fricke and S. Landowne, Phys. Rev. C 40 (1989), 2046[APS].
  18. J. M. Quesada, G. Pollarolo, R. A. Broglia and A. Winther, Nucl. Phys. A 442 (1985), 381[Elsevier].