Quick Search:
Author: Title/Abstract: Vol./No: Page:

Prog. Theor. Phys. Supplement No.157 (2005) pp. 77-81

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (164K) ]

Zero Temperature Phase Diagram of Finite Connectivity Spin Glasses

Florent Krz\cakała

Dipartimento di Fisica, INFM and SMC, Università di Roma “La Sapienza”, P. A. Moro 2, 00185 Roma, Italy

Abstract:

The zero temperature phase diagram of spin glasses on finite connectivity graphs is investigated, with or without magnetic field and/or ferromagnetic bias, for mean field (using the cavity method) and Edwards-Anderson (using numerical ground states computations) models. In the mean field case we show that the phase diagram is complex and compute the equivalent of the zero temperature de Almeida-Thouless line. In the 3d model however, we found a trivial phase diagram. This paper presents new analytical results as well as a rapid review of numerical works on ground states.


URL : http://ptp.ipap.jp/link?PTPS/157/77/
DOI : 10.1143/PTPS.157.77

[ Full Text PDF : FREE ACCESS (164K) ] Citation:


References:

  1. S. F. Edwards and P. W. Anderson, J. of Phys. F 5 (1975), 965[IoP STACKS].
  2. Spin Glasses and Random Fields, ed. A. P. Young (World Scientific, Singapore, 1998).
  3. M. Mézard, G. Parisi and M. A. Virasoro, Spin-Glass Theory and Beyond, Vol. 9 of Lecture Notes in Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1987).
  4. E. Marinari et al., J. Stat. Phys. 98 (2000), 973; J. of Phys. A 31 (1998), 6355[IoP STACKS].
  5. J. R. L. de Almeida and D. J. Thouless, J. of Phys. A 11 (1978), 983[CrossRef].
  6. J. Houdayer and O. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999), 1030[APS].
    A. K. Hartmann, Physica A 224 (1996), 480[CrossRef].
    K. F. Pal, Physica A 223 (1996), 283[CrossRef].
  7. M. Mézard and G. Parisi, Eur. Phys. J. B 20 (2001), 217[CrossRef]; J. Stat. Phys 111 (2003), 1.
  8. A. Montanari et al., J. of Phys. A 37 (2004), 2073[IoP STACKS].
    O. Rivoire et al., Eur. Phys. J. B 37 (2004), 55[CrossRef].
    F. Krzakala et al., Phys. Rev. E 70 (2004), 046705[APS]; cond-mat/0403725[e-print arXiv].
  9. T. Castellani and F. Ricci-Tersenghi, cond-mat/0403053[e-print arXiv].
  10. A. Pagnani, G. Parisi and M. Ratieville, Phys. Rev. E 68 (2003), 046706[APS].
  11. D. S. Fisher and D. A. Huse, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986), 1601[APS].
  12. A. J. Bray and M. A. Moore, in Vol. 275 of Lecture Notes in Physics, ed. J. L. van Hemmen and I. Morgenstern (Springer, Berlin, 1986), p. 121.
  13. F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 89 (2002), 267202[APS].
  14. G. Migliorini and A. N. Berker, Phys. Rev. B. 57 (1998), 426[APS].
  15. J. Houdayer and O. C. Martin, Europhys. Lett. 49 (2000), 794[CrossRef].
  16. F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000), 3013[APS].
  17. M. Palassini and A. P. Young, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000), 3017[APS].
  18. F. Krzakala and O. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001), 197204[APS].
  19. H. Yoshino and P. Jönsson, Prog. Theor. Phys. Suppl. No. 157 (2005), 29[PTP].
    A. P. Young and H. G. Katzgraber, cond-mat/0407031[e-print arXiv].
    J. Houdayer and O. C. Martin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999), 4934[APS].
  20. F. Krzakala, Ph. D Thesis, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Paris VI (2002).
  21. I. R. Pimentel, T. Temesvàri and C. De Dominicis, Phys. Rev. B 65 (2002), 224420[APS].